Technical assessment
CodeIgniter applications without the original team. State, dependencies, security and delivery. The intervention defines evidence, boundaries and a way to verify that change can continue in production.
We provide continuity for CodeIgniter applications, upgrade their technical foundation and reduce the risk of each new change.
We do not choose or maintain a framework in isolation: we account for the team, domain, operations and product horizon.
With CodeIgniter we review both framework use and the decisions built around it: domain model, data access, integrations, frontend, delivery and available knowledge.
CodeIgniter applications without the original team. State, dependencies, security and delivery. The intervention defines evidence, boundaries and a way to verify that change can continue in production.
Pending PHP and framework upgrades. Incidents, prevention and functional evolution. The intervention defines evidence, boundaries and a way to verify that change can continue in production.
Highly coupled modules. PHP, CodeIgniter and libraries in controlled steps. The intervention defines evidence, boundaries and a way to verify that change can continue in production.
New features required without an immediate rewrite. Progressive separation of high-change components. The intervention defines evidence, boundaries and a way to verify that change can continue in production.
State, dependencies, security and delivery.
Incidents, prevention and functional evolution.
PHP, CodeIgniter and libraries in controlled steps.
Progressive separation of high-change components.
The goal is not to apply every possibility in CodeIgniter, but to preserve a foundation the team can understand, test, release and upgrade.
We prioritise flows supporting revenue, operations or user commitments. We add protection where failure has the greatest impact and reduce coupling in components changing most often. This combination enables progress without requiring a prior rewrite or accepting that every delivery adds uncertainty.
Upgrades are part of normal maintenance. We review supported versions, deprecations, packages, runtime and infrastructure frequently enough to avoid traumatic jumps. When migration is required, we divide it by capability, preserve temporary compatibility and prepare observation and rollback.
Yes, after assessing compatibility, PHP version, dependencies and security risks.
It depends on lifecycle and change cost. The audit compares upgrades, evolution and replacement.
Tell us about the context, the main blocker and the outcome you need. We will reply with the questions required for an initial assessment.