Matrix for maintaining, refactoring or rewriting a PHP application
There is no universal answer. This matrix forces comparison of risk, knowledge, data, coverage, change cost and continuity before choosing a path.
Complete the resource with evidence, not ideal answers
A checkbox helps when it represents a verified situation and leads to a conversation or decision.
Bring together people who understand product, development and operations. For each section, identify repositories, configuration, metrics, incidents, screenshots or examples that justify the answer. If evidence does not exist, record the uncertainty: it may matter more than completing the checkbox.
At the end, group findings by impact and dependency. Separate immediate controls, required investigation and structural improvements. The result should state what will be done, who can decide it and how it will be verified, avoiding a wish list without priority.
- EvidenceSource or example supporting each answer.
- ImpactConsequence for users, business or operations.
- PriorityOrder based on risk, dependency and effort.
- ActionOwner, boundary and outcome verification.
System criteria
What shapes technical feasibility.
Delivery criteria
What the organization can sustain.
Options
Four paths that may be combined.
Warning signs
When to challenge a quick decision.
Turn answers into decisions
- Score independently across business, product, engineering and operations.
- Attach evidence and confidence level.
- Compare phased options, not only end states.
- Review the decision as constraints or knowledge change.
Content connected to this decision
Continue with diagnosis, execution or related experience.